๐Ÿ““
Notional Finance
  • ๐Ÿ—’๏ธTo-Do List [Notional]
  • ๐ŸงตTwitter Threads
    • fCash Overview
    • AMM Overview and Trades
    • fCash Valuation 1
    • Liquidity Fees
    • Lenders trade (fCash)
    • Lender Trade 2
    • Borrower trade (fCash)
    • What happens at maturity?
    • Page 2
  • Experiment
    • DUNE & Dashboard
    • Docs & Topics
      • Interest Rate Risk
      • Inverse Interest Rate Risk
      • AMM Curve Comparison
      • Understanding Risk adjusted TVL
      • How Notional stays solvent
      • Liquidation!?
      • Prime Cash
    • Excel & Numbers
      • Duration Risk
      • 200% CR rate comparison
    • Trades
  • Weekly Reproducible Vault
    • 29 May - 4 June
      • Activity
      • IR Compare
    • 5 June - 11 June
    • 12 June - 18 June
  • ๐Ÿ’ธfCash
    • What & Why fCash?
    • fCash Use-case
    • fCash maturity
  • โš—๏ธCounterparty liquidity pool
    • Liquidity pool
    • AMM
    • Liquidity pool interactions
      • Lending Trade
      • Borrow Trade
      • Liquidity provisioning trade
  • ๐Ÿ’นfCash Finances
    • Valuing fCash
    • Risks subject to the change in Rates
      • The upside of the change in Rates
  • ๐ŸšฐLiquidity providers
    • Liquidity provisioning
    • Liquidity provider's portfolio
      • Net Lending Position for an LP
      • Net Borrowing Position for an LP
    • Yield earning (v1)
    • Risks (v1)
  • ๐ŸฅBorrower Resources
    • Collateralization
    • Free Collateral Computations
  • ๐Ÿช™nTokens
    • Automated liquidity provisioning for LPs
    • Mechanics
      • Minting nTokens
      • Redeeming nTokens
    • fCash position for nToken holders
    • Yield earning (v2)
    • Risks (v2)
  • โŒ›Tenor Maturity
    • Maturity
    • fCash maturity
    • Quarterly Rolls
  • ๐Ÿ”Leverage vaults
    • Leveraged yield opportunities
    • Vault mechanics
      • Entering
      • Exiting
    • Collateralization & liquidations
    • Balancer/Aura wstETH/WETH Strategy
      • Entering in Bal/Aura wstETH/WETH strategy
      • Exiting from Bal/Aura wstETH/WETH strategy
  • ๐Ÿ›๏ธV3
    • Page 1
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Experiment
  2. Docs & Topics

AMM Curve Comparison

PreviousInverse Interest Rate RiskNextUnderstanding Risk adjusted TVL

Last updated 2 years ago

FROM

TO

Thread

With Notional v3 the underlying AMM curve is also changing to a more efficient one.

You might have heard of the logit curve, the model that Notional v2 uses to determine the interest rate for each fCash market.

But did you know that we are changing it to a new and improved model? ๐Ÿ˜Š

A ๐Ÿงต to compare b/w the two curves.

---

The logit curve is a symmetrical curve that adjusts the interest rate based on the utilization of the market. The higher the utilization, the higher the interest rate. ๐Ÿ“ˆ

But the logit curve has some issues that make it suboptimal for our protocol. ๐Ÿ˜…

---

The first issue is that the logit curve wastes a lot of capital by allocating it to very low or negative interest rates. This means that a large part of the LPed capital is not earning any return or even losing money. ๐Ÿ’ธ

For example, 40% of the capital on Notional currently sits below the 0% rate. Thatโ€™s not very efficient, is it? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

---

The second issue is that the logit curve makes it difficult to accommodate specific interest rates at certain proportions. This means that we canโ€™t fine-tune the curve to match the market demand and supply. ๐Ÿ“Š

For example, we canโ€™t set the curve to have a flat interest rate of 5% for a wide range of utilization. Thatโ€™s not very flexible, is it? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

---

The third issue is that the logit curve model is relatively complex and slightly unintuitive. This means that itโ€™s hard for users and governance to understand and predict how the curve behaves and changes. ๐Ÿง 

For example, we canโ€™t easily explain how the curve parameters affect the interest rate at different utilization levels. Thatโ€™s not very user-friendly, is it? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ

---

Thatโ€™s why we decided to change the current logit curve model for a double kink interest rate model. The double kink interest rate model has three slopes that define how the interest rate changes with utilization. ๐Ÿ“‰

The double kink model gives us more control and flexibility over the interest rate curve. ๐Ÿ˜

---

With the double kink model, we can:

  • Avoid wasting capital by allocating less liquidity to low or negative interest rates with the first slope. ๐Ÿ’ฐ

  • Accommodate specific interest rates at certain proportions with the second slope. ๐Ÿ’ฏ

  • Make rates increase sufficiently as utilization goes up with the third slope. ๐Ÿ”ฅ

---

The double kink interest rate model is also simpler and more intuitive than the logit curve model. This means that itโ€™s easier for users and governance to understand and predict how the curve behaves and changes. ๐Ÿ˜Ž

---

The double kink interest rate model will only be updatable once every quarterly roll. Governance will need to specify the new curve parameters ahead of the roll and changes will only become effective upon the roll. ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ

---

Thatโ€™s it for this thread. I hope you learned something new today about our interest rate model upgrade and why we are excited about it. ๐Ÿ’ฏ

If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to drop them in the comments below. ๐Ÿ‘‡